Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)
Enacted in 1996, The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) defined marriage as “a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word ‘spouse’ refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.”
The Supreme Court recently ruled that DOMA was unconstitutional. In the case, Edith Windsor was the surviving spouse of Thea Spyer. They were legally married in Canada and living in New York, which recognized their marriage. When Thea passed away, her partner Edith was required to pay approximately $363,000 in federal taxes on her wife’s estate. If the federal government had recognized their relationship, her tax bill would have been $0.
What Happens Now that DOMA has been Overturned?
Despite the Court's ruling, unresolved issues remain both at the federal and state levels. Issues may arise for couples that are married in a state that recognizes same-sex marriage and then move or travel to a state that does not. Some of these issues may arise when the couple is in the process of ending their relationship.
Same-sex couples may also face issues at the state level when they travel to other states. Some of these issues may relate to their children and parental rights.
The Supreme Court decision also differentiated between the various forms of legally recognized same-sex relationships. The court's decision explains that the federal government will recognize gay marriages, but not registered domestic partnerships or civil unions.
What About States that Don’t Recognize Gay Marriage?
In addition to the issues around marriage vs. quasi-marital relationships, same-sex couples who get married in Washington or another state which allows gay marriage may experience problems when they travel. This is especially likely if they move to a state that does not recognize same-sex marriages (or if the couple never resided in a state that had marriage recognition, but married in Washington or another state that recognizes same-sex marriage).
There are approximately 1,000 federal benefits that are connected to marriage. Whether or not the federal government will recognize the rights of same-sex couples who reside outside Washington, in a state that does not recognize same-sex marriage, will vary based on the benefit.
For more information on the various benefits, several of the national LGBT organizations have created a variety of “After DOMA” factsheets.
How Will it Affect Non-Married Same-Sex Couples?
Even with the end of the federal DOMA, legal discrimination against same-sex couples in non-marital relationships (like domestic partnerships and civil unions) continues. Federal law benefits and responsibilities are connected to "marriage." This means that couples in domestic partnerships and civil unions will not benefit from the Windsor decision.
The Supreme Court held that it was unconstitutional for the Federal Government to deny the recognition of a marriage when a state recognized the marriage. However, had Edith and Thea been in a state registered domestic partnership or a civil union, they would have still had to pay taxes. Couples who are not married will still be faced with the estate tax Edith experienced.
Economic Impact of Legalizing Gay Marriage
IMPACT ON FEDERAL AND STATE BUDGETS
Many fear that lifting the federal ban on same-sex marriage would put an immediate drain on federal budgets. Research by the Congressional Budget Office suggests that this is not so: "The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that on net, those impacts would improve the budget's bottom line to a small extent."
Federal income tax revenue would also likely increase, as joint filers often are subject to what is called the " marriage penalty."
Any increased state spending on benefits would be outweighed by savings from lower cash assistance and Medicaid spending. It also appears that state budgets would also get a boost due to wedding licensing fees (e.g. New York City reported a $250 million increase in revenue after legalizing gay marriage).
More same-sex partners would have medical insurance (once they are able to qualify for their spouse's insurance plan), reducing healthcare costs nationwide.
ECONOMIC STIMULATION
The wedding and divorce industry could receive a $9.5 billion boost from the country's nearly 800,000 unmarried same-sex couples.
ECONOMIC ADVANTAGES FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES
While same-sex couples might have to dole out some extra cash to pay for weddings and higher income taxes, they may pay less estate and gift taxes. Same-sex couples may also pay fewer legal fees to create legal ways to share ownership of property, and become parents. They may also pay less to prepare their federal income tax returns.
-
Best Law Firms
-
Best Lawyers
-
Super Lawyers
-
AV Preeminent
-
Avvo 10.0 Superb Family Law
-
AAML
-
Washington's Best Places to Work
-
Best Lawyers
Client testimonials
-
My daughter is the sunshine of my life. I felt despair and a sense of helplessness on the day I was served. On the first appointment day when I arrived at the office and sat down with my lawyer, I knew I had made the right decision. From the beginning of my case to conclusion, I knew I had a great team looking out for my best interest (and the best interest of my child). Thank you McKinley Irvin!- Christine P.
-
Thanks for all the work for our family over the past year. We’re really glad you are on our side.- P.O.
-
David remained very level headed and family focused throughout our proceedings. That said, I always felt my specific needs were very well represented and that I could count on David to be a trusted adviser during an otherwise difficult time.- T.M.
-
In our search for a reputable law firm to handle my sister’s divorce case, we explored our options until we found the McKinley Irvin law firm. McKinley Irvin has, through our experience, proven to be compassionate, understanding and patient during the long term process of my sister’s case. Due to her disabilities she needed more than the legalities and McKinley Irvin was able to provide their knowledge as well as the assurance to my sister that her case would be handled in her best interest. We cannot begin to express our gratitude for all that the McKinley Irvin law firm has done for us. We would highly recommend the knowledgeable and dedicated law firm of McKinley Irvin to anyone who might be seeking legal services.- P.M.
-
Without David and Sam, there is no way I could have made it through this exceptionally difficult time in my life. I cannot imagine two people better able to represent me, nor a better firm to handle my affairs. You all have been wonderful!- M.L.
-
My attorney was very good in and out of the courtroom. Always kept me up to date on any issues that came up and was very knowledgeable on custody issues.- R.R.
-
I would like to give my sincere appreciation to Jennifer Payseno and staff. You all stood by me no matter how trying my case got. I always felt at ease knowing that you were there to guide me through this most difficult time. Thank you for not only being my attorney but becoming part of our extended family.- M.F.
-
Dave, thank you very much for doing such a wonderful job. It has been a pleasure working with you.- R.C.