Washington Collaborative Divorce Lawyers
Helping People Achieve Successful Collaborative Divorces
The divorce process that most people are familiar with is the traditional litigation method, which uses our justice system, which is, by nature, an adversarial process. A negotiated agreement between the parties resolves the vast majority of divorce cases; however, if parties are unable to settle family law matters using the traditional approach, then the parties must go to court and present their cases before a judge, who will hopefully rule in favor of your desired outcome.
Litigation is appropriate in many situations, but it is not always the ideal avenue for every couple seeking a divorce. Collaborative divorce may be a better option for couples in a low-conflict situation where there is a mutual goal to leave the marriage as amicably as possible while achieving fairness.
Call McKinley Irvin today at (206) 625-9600 or contact us online to schedule a meeting with our collaborative divorce attorney in Washington!
Why Collaborative Law is a Smart Choice for Family Law Cases
Collaborative Law refers to a method of resolving family law cases that prohibits court intervention. It can be used in a variety of Washington State family law cases, including divorces, legal separations, child support modifications, parenting plan modifications, paternity matters, and relocation cases.
Some benefits of Collaborative Divorce to consider include:
- The "final say" will not be in the hands of a judge
- Potentially less costly than traditional divorce, especially when heavy litigation is involved
- Often, this option is less adversarial and more amicable than traditional divorce
The Collaborative Divorce lawyers at McKinley Irvin have helped many divorcing couples reach reciprocally satisfying resolutions civilly and respectfully by using various dispute resolution approaches, including Collaborative Divorce.
Working Together to Reach a Mutually Agreeable Resolution
In the unique Collaborative Divorce process, each party retains a lawyer specially trained to handle Collaborative Divorce cases. The lawyers representing both parties are not at odds, as with divorce litigation, but rather work as a team to reach a mutually agreeable resolution.
The collaborative team includes not only the divorcing couple and their lawyers but can also include a financial specialist, a divorce coach, and a child specialist if children are involved.
Signing a Participation Agreement
The Collaborative Divorce process commences with the signing of a participation agreement. By signing this agreement, both parties and their team members agree to resolve all disputes outside of court and in a respectful, confidential manner. The Participation Agreement also includes information about the Collaborative Divorce process, such as its rules and expectations.
Settling And Resolving Collaborative Divorce Cases
In our experience, arriving at a resolution in collaborative cases typically takes about the same amount of time as traditional divorce cases. Once both parties agree on a settlement, the lawyers draft the formal agreement and enter the agreed-upon final orders with a court, which legally dissolves the marriage. These steps complete the collaborative proceeding with the court.
The 4 Key Principles of Collaborative Law
In theory, the Collaborative Law process sounds like the perfect choice, but divorce and family law matters are emotionally charged. In reality, the parties frequently cannot work together effectively or agree on a fair and reasonable resolution. Many instances make Collaborative Law a poor choice, such as domestic violence, a historical imbalance of power in the relationship, a lack of trust, or the inability to communicate constructively or respectfully.
The four key principles in Collaborative Law are:
- Both parties commit to resolving all issues by agreement without court intervention or threat of detention.
- If either client seeks court intervention, both attorneys must withdraw from representation, and each party must hire a new attorney.
- Both parties and the attorneys agree to participate in good faith negotiations, disclose all information openly and freely, and interact respectfully.
- All participants agree that all communications (oral or written) prepared during the Collaborative Law process are inadmissible in any future court proceeding without the express written consent of the participants.
Understanding the Distinctions Between Collaborative, Cooperative, and Traditional Law Practices
There are fundamental differences between Collaborative, Cooperative, and traditional law practice.
If negotiations don’t work:
- Collaborative Law – You must fire your attorney, hire a new attorney to go to court, and start your case from the beginning.
- Cooperative Law & Traditional Law Practice—Your case continues with your attorney, the work done up to failed negotiations is preserved, and the court or arbitrator decides unresolved issues.
McKinley Irvin offers Collaborative Law representation in family law matters. We believe it can work for some, but also that clients should approach this method after fully disclosing the pros and cons and with the knowledge that there are alternative dispute resolution methods that may have less drastic consequences than Collaborative Law.
Is Collaborative Divorce Right For You?
Divorcing is not always easy, regardless of your chosen method. Our team of skilled professionals will ensure that you choose the best dispute-resolution process for your unique situation. While Collaborative Divorce is generally a more amicable option, it does not mean you and your spouse must agree at all times or on all points. Choosing this method does, however, require both parties to be willing to understand one another's point of view and treat each other to arrive at a mutually beneficial resolution.
Collaborative Divorce also requires a significant amount of time and focus on communication, four-way meetings, and engaged processing between the parties themselves, their attorneys, and the collateral professionals involved in the case. As such, parties should be equally secure and confident in their ability to openly and honestly communicate with one another.
Collaborative Divorce may also be a suitable option for non-traditional families, such as couples in same-sex relationships or couples in non-marital relationships. The laws governing these family relationships are constantly evolving, and our lawyers are at the forefront of this emerging area of family law.
When Collaborative Divorce May Not Be the Best Fit
The Collaborative Divorce process is not suitable for everyone. In some cases, both parties may be unable to agree. In this event, the collaborative process can be terminated. Once the collaborative process is terminated, both parties can use the traditional method. Still, they may not do so using the attorneys or experts involved during the collaborative divorce process.
By choosing to terminate the collaborative process and move forward with the traditional dispute resolution process, both parties are essentially agreeing to:
- Retain new counsel - collaborative attorneys cannot represent the parties in any future litigation or traditional adversarial process, and
- Start casework over - in court; you generally cannot use the work done in the collaborative process.
We recommend considering the cooperative divorce dispute resolution model for those who like the idea of minimizing conflict but without the risk of having to hire new divorce lawyers and start the process over again.
Contact Our Washington Collaborative Divorce Attorneys Today
McKinley Irvin will help you navigate the unique issues and processes involved in Collaborative Divorce, whether in a traditional or non-traditional family situation. If you are considering divorce and would like to explore your options for resolving your divorce, we encourage you to contact us and schedule a consultation. The Collaborative process is just one of several approaches available for couples seeking a divorce. We will help you identify the Collaborative or otherwise process that is best for your particular circumstances.
Contact McKinley Irvin today to meet with our collaborative divorce lawyer in Washington!
-
Best Law Firms
-
Best Lawyers
-
Super Lawyers
-
AV Preeminent
-
Avvo 10.0 Superb Family Law
-
AAML
-
Washington's Best Places to Work
-
Best Lawyers
Client testimonials
-
My daughter is the sunshine of my life. I felt despair and a sense of helplessness on the day I was served. On the first appointment day when I arrived at the office and sat down with my lawyer, I knew I had made the right decision. From the beginning of my case to conclusion, I knew I had a great team looking out for my best interest (and the best interest of my child). Thank you McKinley Irvin!- Christine P.
-
Thanks for all the work for our family over the past year. We’re really glad you are on our side.- P.O.
-
David remained very level headed and family focused throughout our proceedings. That said, I always felt my specific needs were very well represented and that I could count on David to be a trusted adviser during an otherwise difficult time.- T.M.
-
In our search for a reputable law firm to handle my sister’s divorce case, we explored our options until we found the McKinley Irvin law firm. McKinley Irvin has, through our experience, proven to be compassionate, understanding and patient during the long term process of my sister’s case. Due to her disabilities she needed more than the legalities and McKinley Irvin was able to provide their knowledge as well as the assurance to my sister that her case would be handled in her best interest. We cannot begin to express our gratitude for all that the McKinley Irvin law firm has done for us. We would highly recommend the knowledgeable and dedicated law firm of McKinley Irvin to anyone who might be seeking legal services.- P.M.
-
Without David and Sam, there is no way I could have made it through this exceptionally difficult time in my life. I cannot imagine two people better able to represent me, nor a better firm to handle my affairs. You all have been wonderful!- M.L.
-
My attorney was very good in and out of the courtroom. Always kept me up to date on any issues that came up and was very knowledgeable on custody issues.- R.R.
-
I would like to give my sincere appreciation to Jennifer Payseno and staff. You all stood by me no matter how trying my case got. I always felt at ease knowing that you were there to guide me through this most difficult time. Thank you for not only being my attorney but becoming part of our extended family.- M.F.
-
Dave, thank you very much for doing such a wonderful job. It has been a pleasure working with you.- R.C.